<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Life in the Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datacenterlife.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com</link>
	<description>Trying to keep it above the water line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Azure &#8211; Life in the Cloud by Danny O</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/29/microsoft-azure-life-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=185#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Ts-Admin,
Thanks for you post. I am presently reading up on Cloud Hosting and Testing for the company I work for and after reading your post it opened my eyes a bit more about MS Azure. I wish I could say the say for Mr. Chou at Microsoft, your post simply came off as defensive of the MS product rather than talking to the cost issue and inflexibility of the application. But I do believe your statement that Azure &quot;will be changing very rapidly&quot; is accurate, Microsoft does like to improve on itself and that at least is a plus in my opinion.

I will continue on in my research. Thank you Ts-Admin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ts-Admin,<br />
Thanks for you post. I am presently reading up on Cloud Hosting and Testing for the company I work for and after reading your post it opened my eyes a bit more about MS Azure. I wish I could say the say for Mr. Chou at Microsoft, your post simply came off as defensive of the MS product rather than talking to the cost issue and inflexibility of the application. But I do believe your statement that Azure &#8220;will be changing very rapidly&#8221; is accurate, Microsoft does like to improve on itself and that at least is a plus in my opinion.</p>
<p>I will continue on in my research. Thank you Ts-Admin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Initializing your CX4 Array by pharmacy technician</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/16/initializing-your-cx4/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>pharmacy technician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=167#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Azure &#8211; Life in the Cloud by David Chou</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/29/microsoft-azure-life-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=185#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Ts-admin, thanks for taking a look at Windows Azure! Your observations are correct, though I’d like to suggest a different way to look at Azure, as it’s why you’re finding the differences that contribute to the con’s you noted. Basically, we think cloud computing is not exactly the same as cloud hosting; and Azure was designed from that perspective – to enable agility (much more so than cost reduction) and to support Internet-scale applications.

From the agility perspective, we wanted Azure to allow people to deploy applications and have them up and running within a matter of minutes, without having to maintain and interact with server OS. From Internet-scale applications perspective, we wanted Azure to allow people to be able to start with a small footprint, but can easily scale out to thousands of servers supporting millions of users. For example, applications like Facebook and Twitter; Azure can help simplify the engineering efforts required to build and operate these applications in on-premises environments. That’s the primary use case for Azure today, and thus why it isn’t ideally suited for hosting all the same things we host in our own environments today.

Plus, Microsoft has a whole ecosystem of hosting partners. To offer Azure as pure cloud hosting would mean competing with our own ecosystem. Furthermore, we do think that many data center teams can do hosting themselves much more effectively (like you stated), kind of like the analogy between owning and maintaining your car (and being able to tune and optimize it any way you want), versus taking public transportation (which is what Azure is more like).

Of course, the current state in Azure will be changing very rapidly. Many of the new features to be rolled out this year will make Azure a lot friendlier to more existing workloads, such as Admin Mode, VM Role, full IIS control, and eventually the Appliance.
Now let’s look at Microsoft’s overall cloud strategy. It has never been our intention to position Azure as something that will completely replace data center environments today. Our servers and tools business will continue to evolve and support on-premises deployment of software and building private clouds, for example. Azure is a public cloud environment that is more appropriate for things that live on the Internet, and less ideally suited for things that just need a place to host. Thus Microsoft’s overall cloud strategy is to provide both software and cloud services as options for customers to choose from; as both are still very valid models in today’s world.

Just my thoughts. Best! -David Chou (Microsoft)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ts-admin, thanks for taking a look at Windows Azure! Your observations are correct, though I’d like to suggest a different way to look at Azure, as it’s why you’re finding the differences that contribute to the con’s you noted. Basically, we think cloud computing is not exactly the same as cloud hosting; and Azure was designed from that perspective – to enable agility (much more so than cost reduction) and to support Internet-scale applications.</p>
<p>From the agility perspective, we wanted Azure to allow people to deploy applications and have them up and running within a matter of minutes, without having to maintain and interact with server OS. From Internet-scale applications perspective, we wanted Azure to allow people to be able to start with a small footprint, but can easily scale out to thousands of servers supporting millions of users. For example, applications like Facebook and Twitter; Azure can help simplify the engineering efforts required to build and operate these applications in on-premises environments. That’s the primary use case for Azure today, and thus why it isn’t ideally suited for hosting all the same things we host in our own environments today.</p>
<p>Plus, Microsoft has a whole ecosystem of hosting partners. To offer Azure as pure cloud hosting would mean competing with our own ecosystem. Furthermore, we do think that many data center teams can do hosting themselves much more effectively (like you stated), kind of like the analogy between owning and maintaining your car (and being able to tune and optimize it any way you want), versus taking public transportation (which is what Azure is more like).</p>
<p>Of course, the current state in Azure will be changing very rapidly. Many of the new features to be rolled out this year will make Azure a lot friendlier to more existing workloads, such as Admin Mode, VM Role, full IIS control, and eventually the Appliance.<br />
Now let’s look at Microsoft’s overall cloud strategy. It has never been our intention to position Azure as something that will completely replace data center environments today. Our servers and tools business will continue to evolve and support on-premises deployment of software and building private clouds, for example. Azure is a public cloud environment that is more appropriate for things that live on the Internet, and less ideally suited for things that just need a place to host. Thus Microsoft’s overall cloud strategy is to provide both software and cloud services as options for customers to choose from; as both are still very valid models in today’s world.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts. Best! -David Chou (Microsoft)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Azure &#8211; Life in the Cloud by WP Themes</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/29/microsoft-azure-life-in-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>WP Themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 08:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=185#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Nice post and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you seeking your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you seeking your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Accidently Delete Entire OU of Computer Objects by replica handbag</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/05/01/accidently-delete-entire-ou-of-computer-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>replica handbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=22#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I love your site. Christopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your site. Christopher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DotNetNuke Hack &#8211; Update/Check your Stuff! by designer replica handbags</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/05/dotnetnuke-hack-updatecheck-your-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>designer replica handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=124#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I really appreciate your article, in fact I think you deserve a thumbs up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I really appreciate your article, in fact I think you deserve a thumbs up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conficker Worm &#8211; It&#8217;s not just for Breakfast! by lose stomach fat</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2009/03/31/conficker-worm-its-not-just-for-breakfast/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>lose stomach fat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=14#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Awesome article, but just curious, what is your main field of expertise?  Do you write part time, or are you a professional in your field?  I wouldn&#039;t mind reading an About Us section or something to describe what you do so I can better understand your point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article, but just curious, what is your main field of expertise?  Do you write part time, or are you a professional in your field?  I wouldn&#8217;t mind reading an About Us section or something to describe what you do so I can better understand your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Converged Networking &#8211; HP, ESX and Cisco by Cosmetic Dentist Woodland Hills</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/06/30/converged-networking-esx-and-cisco/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmetic Dentist Woodland Hills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=90#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I couldn’t resist commenting. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn’t resist commenting. <img src='http://www.datacenterlife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Converged Networking &#8211; HP, ESX and Cisco by Landscaping Wilmington</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/06/30/converged-networking-esx-and-cisco/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Landscaping Wilmington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=90#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hey mate, greetz  from  Germany !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey mate, greetz  from  Germany !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DotNetNuke Hack &#8211; Update/Check your Stuff! by buy backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.datacenterlife.com/2010/07/05/dotnetnuke-hack-updatecheck-your-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>buy backlinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datacenterlife.com/?p=124#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Really great informative blog post here and I just wanted to comment &amp; thank you for posting this. I&#039;ve bookmarked youi blog and I&#039;ll be back to read more in the future my friend! Also nice colors on the layout, it&#039;s really easy on the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great informative blog post here and I just wanted to comment &amp; thank you for posting this. I&#8217;ve bookmarked youi blog and I&#8217;ll be back to read more in the future my friend! Also nice colors on the layout, it&#8217;s really easy on the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

